What did your group gain from this peer review process?
We notice that from the other group, we are lacking some important point. Bibliography is one of them. We notice that even if we have collected so many information, we do not have the main source of where we got the information from. We need to check that up and also need to settle the problem. We also did not include the personal role of each members of the group, but we also need to check this up with the teacher, Miss Suzy, since she did not mention it to the group in our class (we only found out about it after the other teacher, Miss Gita, from the other class mention it to us)
Also, our group partner, the other group that we have to discuss the outcomes with (Stephanie's group) mention something about our use of words. They said that we have included so many things but also because of it we have also use so many words that when we counted the page, it exceed 40 pages (53 pages). The other group said that it is ironic the fact that we are the environment group and yet use so many pages (papers) but in my opinion, the examiner will use a disk, practically use electronic (computer) to check / mark it. But even if that is true, it will still be a bit of disadvantage if our group project will be check last and since the words it self exceed 5000 words (about 9000 words) the examiner will be tired of all the reading, they would lose interest in it. So we are working on making the words a bit less in case it is the situation.
What were the strengths and areas for development of your project?
Strength: We manage include so many strong information, prove.
Weakness: We have too many words.
How will your group move forward now?
We will be discussing whether to cut down some of the stuff, create a formal bibliography, talk to Ms. Suzy about the group/ individual activity list and finally discuss about our individual element.
No comments:
Post a Comment